返回列表 回复 发帖

俄罗斯远东滨海Boisman新石器组古DNA:M401+近支

本帖最后由 Yungsiyebu 于 2017-8-19 17:04 编辑

人类学年会(内蒙古站)上的消息。

回顾一下波伊斯曼的人骨研究,基本上与东北地区的古东北类型新石器时代古人聚类,差异很小。

值得注意是,古蒙古高原类型,其实内部差异非常大,新石器时代贝加尔湖东西两岸的新石器时代古人很接近的BOISMAN等东北各组,但到了青铜时代,以蒙古和外贝加尔石板墓为代表的人群,则明显偏离这个区间。
不过Boisman有一定颅骨变形,这可能会影响对这个种系判断的准确度。
A metric assessment of evidence for artificial cranial modification at the Boisman 2 Neolithic cemetery (ca. 5800–5400 14C BP), Primorye, Russian Far East
The Middle Neolithic (ca. 5800–5400 14C BP) shell-midden cemetery Boisman 2, located on the Russian coast of the Sea of Japan, is one of only three Neolithic sites in all of Primorye at which human remains have been recovered, and therefore it is the key site representing a major cultural reorganization in which terrestrial foragers adopted a more seasonally-sedentary, marine-based subsistence economy. Previous research at the site has described a variety of forms of artificial cranial modification. As a permanent bodily modification that is applied to infants, cranial modification is one important method of symbolizing ascribed social identities and so can be useful for archaeological investigations into inter- and intra-group social relations. The aim of the present study is to re-evaluate the evidence for cranial modification at Boisman 2 using two sets of discriminant function analyses designed to provide a more objective means of identifying modified and unmodified crania. Our results confirm the use of artificial cranial modification at the site, making Boisman 2 one of the earliest – if not the earliest – documented example of the practice in Holocene East Asia; however, our metric analysis identified only six crania as modified, instead of the 11 previously identified through visual assessment. Further research is required to determine whether this discrepancy is a product of the conservative nature of the discriminant functions, the potential that the discriminant function produces inaccurate results for crania from this population, or whether normal or incidental variation in this population resembles artificial cranial shaping. Finally, as a means of introducing some potential hypotheses for future research, we discuss preliminary associations between the presence of cranial modification, age, sex, and burial cluster.
蒙古高原和东北亚.jpg
boisman.jpg
新技术方案尝试:低覆盖全基因组,最低成本深度解析父系源流,略有成效,大家一起摸索。微博@基因人王冰 QQ群:387100816。
哈哈,看来某些人打脸了。
这个很重要,对于推测M401下爱新觉罗簇以及达斡尔簇和星簇的起源具有重大意义
人们时常从外贝加尔去寻找源头,但目前看来外贝加尔早期的父系很可能是N北支为主,到了青铜时期出现了Q1a3的支系,因此整体上C2北支的起源地点应该在别处寻找
三界无安,犹如火宅。众苦充满,甚可怖畏
                            --------《法华经》
是以法从心生。名因法立
                      ------------《宗镜录》
滨海边疆区,具体点是哪里?乌苏里江兴凯湖周边?古东北人种 C2北。
无善 发表于 2017-8-19 21:06
邻近日本海。
新技术方案尝试:低覆盖全基因组,最低成本深度解析父系源流,略有成效,大家一起摸索。微博@基因人王冰 QQ群:387100816。
大彼得湾。
这个应该是博伊斯曼文化的,和属于新开流-鲁德纳亚文化的鬼门洞遗址人骨都属于古东北人种类型
http://www.ranhaer.org/thread-34683-1-1.html
无善 发表于 2017-8-20 12:21
鬼门洞的玉玦6-7000年就出来在日本列岛上了,

王冰老师 或者谁有没有日本c2b数据吗?我觉得有可能能解决一个长期的谜题
20171016_185427.437.jpg
于今腐草无萤火 钟古垂杨有暮鸦
这个很重要,对于推测M401下爱新觉罗簇以及达斡尔簇和星簇的起源具有重大意义
人们时常从外贝加尔去寻找源头,但目前看来外贝加尔早期的父系很可能是N北支为主,到了青铜时期出现了Q1a3的支系,因此整体上C2北支的起 ...
sahaliyan 发表于 2017-8-19 20:38
请教gorio 满语里跟 kara gara这样的发音象吗?
于今腐草无萤火 钟古垂杨有暮鸦
都没有琉球数据吗
于今腐草无萤火 钟古垂杨有暮鸦
返回列表
baidu
互联网 www.ranhaer.org